Otonomi Daerah dan Hubungan Pusat-Daerah: Analisis Kewenangan Khusus Pemprov DKI Jakarta Pasca-Pengesahan Status Ibu Kota
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61492/baashima.v4i3.637Keywords:
Regional Autonomy, Intergovernmental Relations, Special Authority, Special Region of Jakarta, Global CityAbstract
The enactment of Law Number 2 of 2024 concerning the Special Region of Jakarta (DKJ) introduces a fundamental shift in the landscape of regional autonomy and intergovernmental relations in Indonesia. This study aims to analyze the reorientation of special authority granted to the Jakarta Provincial Government following its status transition from the National Capital to a National Economic Center and Global City. Utilizing a qualitative approach with a descriptive-analytical method, data were gathered through document analysis of legal regulations, public policy literature, and official government reports. The theoretical framework incorporates concepts of decentralization, asymmetric autonomy, and intergovernmental relations (IGR). The findings reveal that the dynamics of central-local relations in this new era are characterized by a shift from political-administrative dependency toward enhanced economic self-reliance and agglomeration area governance. While special authorities in investment, spatial planning, and transportation offer flexibility for the Jakarta Provincial Government, they also present potential risks of jurisdictional overlaps with the central government and surrounding buffer regions. This study concludes that the effectiveness of Jakarta’s special authority heavily relies on harmonious intergovernmental coordination mechanisms and clear secondary regulations.
References
Agranoff, R. (2012). Local governments in federal systems: Intergovernmental relations in the federal state. McGill-Queen's University Press.
Ahrend, R., Farchy, E., Kaplanis, I., & Yamano, N. (2017). What makes cities more productive? Agglomeration economies and the role of urban governance: Evidence from 5 OECD countries. Journal of Regional Science, 57(3), 385–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12334
Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi DKI Jakarta. (2023). Laporan pertumbuhan ekonomi DKI Jakarta Triwulan III-2023. BPS Provinsi DKI Jakarta.
Brenner, N. (2004). New state spaces: Urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199270057.001.0001
Congleton, R. D., Kyriacou, A., & Bacaria, J. (2003). A theory of asymmetric federalism. European Journal of Political Economy, 19(2), 299–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-2680(02)00181-7
Firman, T. (2021). The urbanisation of Jakarta Metropolitan Area (JMA): Integration, governance, and challenges. Journal of Urban Affairs, 43(8), 1145–1162. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2020.1742520
Harvey, D. (1989). From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 71(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.1989.11879583
Kantor, P. (2008). Varieties of public-private partnerships in the governance of cities: A comparative assessment. Urban Affairs Review, 43(4), 503–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087407308288
Kim, S. (2014). Asymmetric decentralization and the politics of urban governance: The case of Seoul Metropolitan Government. Urban Studies, 51(7), 1435–1452. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013498624
Kübler, D., & Heinelt, H. (2005). Metropolitan governance, democracy and performance. In H. Heinelt & D. Kübler (Eds.), Metropolitan governance: Capacity, democracy and the dynamics of place (pp. 8–28). Routledge.
Kurniawan, T. (2022). Institutional deadlock in managing the Jakarta metropolitan area: Evaluation of cross-boundary infrastructure governance. Indonesian Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 6(1), 45–62.
Lefèvre, C. (1998). Metropolitan government and governance in western countries: A critical review. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 22(1), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00120
Lefèvre, C. (2018). Building the Métropole du Grand Paris: A state-driven institutional reform. Urban Research & Practice, 11(4), 332–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2018.1505271
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Peters, B. G. (2019). The politics of bureaucracy: An introduction to comparative public administration (7th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315170251
Pierre, J. (2011). Steering from the centre: Strengthening central government capacity to deliver. Oxford University Press.
Prasojo, E., & Holidin, D. (2021). Reformasi birokrasi dan tata kelola pemerintahan asimetris di Indonesia. UI Publishing.
Raharjo, A. W. (2020). Desentralisasi asimetris dalam Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia: Kerangka konseptual dan efektivitas kelembagaan. Jurnal Tata Kelola dan Kebijakan Publik, 7(2), 89–104.
Sassen, S. (2001). The global city: New York, London, Tokyo (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.
Skelcher, C. (2007). Does democracy survive sub-regional governance? Neighborhoods, networks, and the new urban politics. In V. Lowndes, H. Sullivan, & C. Skelcher (Eds.), Designing public opportunities (pp. 121–138). Palgrave Macmillan.
Sorensen, A. (2001). Sub-centre formation in Tokyo: The politics of planning Tokyo's rapid expansion. Third World Planning Review, 23(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.3828/twpr.23.1.x0766k2022n80g14
Sutrisno, B., & Wijaya, H. (2021). Evaluasi otonomi khusus DKI Jakarta sebagai ibu kota negara dalam perspektif hubungan pusat-daerah. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Kebijakan Publik, 8(3), 210–228.
Swilling, M. (2016). The age of sustainability: Just transitions in a complex world. Routledge.
Thornley, A., Rydin, Y., Yiannakou, A., & McNamara, P. (2005). Business involvement in London’s strategic planning: The role of the Greater London Authority. Urban Studies, 42(11), 1947–1965. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500279768
Travers, T. (2004). The politics of London: Governing an ungovernable city. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524415
Tsukamoto, T. (2012). Neoliberalization and the transformation of urban governance in Tokyo. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36(6), 1208–1229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01080.x
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 244.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 29 Tahun 2007 tentang Pemerintahan Provinsi Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta sebagai Ibukota Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2007 Nomor 93.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 21 Tahun 2023 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 tentang Ibu Kota Negara. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2023 Nomor 142.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2024 tentang Provinsi Daerah Khusus Jakarta. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2024 Nomor 80.
van Kempen, R., Vermeulen, M., & Baan, A. (Eds.). (2005). Urban issues and urban policies in the new Europe. Ashgate Publishing.
Wollmann, H. (2010). The two-tier system of local government in Berlin: Between decentralization and recentralization. Local Government Studies, 36(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930903435807
Wright, D. S. (1988). Understanding intergovernmental relations (3rd ed.). Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 M. Fadhillah Harnawansyah, Bhakti Nur Avianto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
